REVIEWER'S COMMENTS ON ARTICLE 1

Reviewers ' Comments : Reviewer # 1 ( Remarks

I wondered whether this strategy switch (go central, go toward the target) was a conscious, cognitive thing (seems likely), but I found it interesting in this regard that the use of the strategy varied with speed even in the slow condition. In our paper on this (cited here), the switch is continuous depending on the priors; here it's treated somewhat like a binary switch even though that seems ...

Responses about reviewers ' comments : Reviewer 1 (

Peer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers

The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...

Response to Reviewers ’ Comments

Comments on Durst’s article

I would like to begin by briefly reviewing the assumptions and hypotheses the NSM approach is predicated on. The goal of this exercise is to understand how these are interrelated, what hinges on every one of them, and what consequences arise from discarding an assumption or disproving a hypothesis. This process defines a number of projects which all agree up to some point and then depart. Prima...